deviant art

Deviant Login Shop
 Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
  • Canvas
  • Photo
  • Art Gifts
more ▶

More from *duncan-blues

Featured in Groups:

Details

September 16, 2007
99.6 KB
1152×768
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 9
Favourites: 6 [who?]

Views: 284 (0 today)

Camera Data

Konica Minolta Camera, Inc.
DiMAGE A2
Aug 31, 2007, 9:03:14 PM
[x]
:iconduncan-blues:
"Distant Star over Blue Waters"

(Yes, there is a star among the clouds on the left. Only visible in full size. Real stars are just that tiny on photographies)


This image is based on two long time exposure shots, combined into a HDR (high dynamic range) image and then tonemapped and gently touched up.
It was taken at a lake in Dalarna/Sweden using a KonicaMinolta DiMAGE A2, the same spot as in my traditional photography deviation The Blue Hour from 2003.
Add a Comment:
 
:icont0xicstorm:
Was perusing Long Exposure Club gallery and came across this...it's most definitely a :+fav: !

:)
Reply
:iconserenity74:
is this what heaven looks like :)
Reply
:iconduncan-blues:
*duncan-blues Dec 30, 2007  Hobbyist Photographer
That's what I often think whenever I think back at my vacation(s) to Sweden.
Been to that particular place at least 10 times during the last 26 years and I could probably go there another 20 times and still find reasons to go back yet another time.
The country, the landscape, wildlife... everything is so great up there!
Reply
:iconserenity74:
it looks so peaceful and serene :) thankyou for sharing it with us :hug:
Reply
:iconorchestrator:
Nice. And yeah, that star looks like just a hot pixel.
Reply
:iconduncan-blues:
*duncan-blues Sep 18, 2007  Hobbyist Photographer
Problem is: The clearer the air is, the tinier a star gets on a photo. Unless you have some 400mm tele lens, it will always look just like a hot pixel.
(Or you have to do extra long exposures of >30 seconds, then a pixel turns into a thin line as the star moves across the sky)
Reply
:iconshinga:
Oooh, how pretty!
Reply
:iconkessalia:
~kessalia Sep 16, 2007  Hobbyist Photographer
Star... star... Ah! I think I see it. Wow, yeah, tiny. *L* Wow, no color changing on this? It's really pretty!! I've never done much experimenting with long exposures - mainly because I'm too darn lazy to use a tripod though I know damn well I should.
Reply
:iconduncan-blues:
*duncan-blues Sep 16, 2007  Hobbyist Photographer
Yeah a tripod is a great thing and bothersome at the same time.
A friend of mine who was travelling with me this year brought a HUGE professional Manfrotto tripod that could be extended to a height that you'd need a ladder to operate the camera. It was huge, bulky and incredibly heavy but I've never used a more rock-solid tripod before. You could get a series of super steady shots from virtually any surface in any terrain.
This picture was taken with a very very small tripod though. I placed the camera almost down onto the boat platform, that created the weird perspective. I had to choose a very narrow aperture to get both foreground and background sharp, that increased the exposure time even more. One shot was 1.5 seconds, the second one even a whole ten seconds.
The color of the picture wasn't changed in post-work but I deliberately picked a daytime white balance on the camera which made the picture even more deeply blue than the scene already was. Note that it was past 9pm when I took it and that was way up north where it already gets dark very early around this time of the year.
Reply
Add a Comment: